Skip to main content

Command Palette

Search for a command to run...

I Benchmarked 8 “AI Image Compression” Tools Using a 20MB File — Only Two Passed

Published
I Benchmarked 8 “AI Image Compression” Tools Using a 20MB File — Only Two Passed
E

Engineered AI is built for techies, solopreneurs, and workflow tinkerers who are tired of fluff. We break down prompt engineering, automation tools, and real no-code setups that work — without needing five tabs open, three APIs, and your sanity.

AI image compression tools love to promise magic: smaller file size, zero quality loss. Reality? Not so clean.
I took a 6144×4096 PNG (20.3MB) generated via Sora, ran it through Upscayl, resized to 1600×1067, and tested 8 different tools claiming to use AI compression.
ai, image-optimization, devtools, blogging, webperf

Tested Tools (besides Squoosh):

  • ✅ ShortPixel

  • ❌ TinyPNG

  • ❌ Nero AI

  • ❌ Optidash

  • ❌ Pixelcut

  • ❌ ImageAI (img.ly)

  • ❌ Krikey AI

  • ❌ Imagify

TLDR Verdict:

  • ✅ ShortPixel (after resize) came closest to Squoosh in preserving clarity and reducing file size.

  • ❌ TinyPNG blurred faces and gradients.

  • ❌ Nero AI, Optidash destroyed soft tones.

  • ❌ Others weren’t even real compressors.

Real Compression Wins:

  • 1. Squoosh – gold standard

  • 2. ShortPixel – resized, reliable

I included real visual comparisons using a UI-heavy, facial-gradient test image — not stock thumbnails. This wasn't marketing. It was a teardown.

➡️ Full benchmark with side-by-side visuals:
🔗 https://engineeredai.net/ai-image-compression-tools-benchmark/

Written by the Chaos Optimizer behind Engineered AI — no fluff, no hype, just brutal benchmarks and tools that actually work.
About | More Posts